Unique identifier of the algorithm

Is the status algorithm recognized in regulatory frameworks of leading government bodies?

Algorithm that behind the implementation of the revocation (Bitlist = each credential has a position in the list. Deny-List: revoked credentials will be added on demand. Accumulator: cryptographic proof the holder presents to show that the credential is not revoked)

How performant is the revocation mechanism (for issuer, holder and verifier)?

Does the Verifier have the possibility to observe the revocation status beyond the presentation?

Does the issuer have possibilities to trace the usage of his issued credentials through the revocation mechanism?

At what scale has the algorithm/technology been demonstrated to work? Are there any known issues?

Does the revocation mechanism support an authentication if the holder is offline?

limitations by accumulator size

potentially possible with malicious issuer by providing a revocation list with a single entry